WOJAN v. IGL


259 Wis. 511 (1951)

WOJAN, Plaintiff and Respondent, vs. IGL, Defendant and Respondent: BUTLER and another, Defendants and Appellants. [Case No. 47.] BUTLER, Appellant, vs. IGL, Respondent. [Case No. 48.]

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

October 9, 1951.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellants there was a brief by James R. Durfee, attorney, and Gustav Winter of counsel, both of Antigo, and oral argument by Mr. Winter.

For the respondents there was a brief by O'Melia & Kaye, attorneys, and John F. O'Melia of counsel, all of Rhinelander, for John A. Igl, and Rex M. Smith of Antigo, for Marie Wojan, and oral argument by Mr. John F. O'Melia and Mr. Smith.


MARTIN, J.

There was considerable conflict in the testimony as to how the collision occurred, and the questions as to negligence were properly for the jury. However, the answers to question 2 (causation) and question 6 (comparison of negligence) cannot stand together. The verdict is inconsistent.

If, in answering question 2, the jury had found Igl's negligence as to lookout and control causal, this court would have...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases