1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Or.
  4. 191 Or.
  5. 191 Or. 577 (1951)
 

NORTON ET UX. v. VAN VOORST ET UX.

191 Or. 577 (1951)

231 P.2d 947

NORTON ET UX. v. VAN VOORST ET UX.

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Affirmed May 23, 1951.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas C. Hartfiel, of Roseburg, argued the cause and filed a brief for appellants.

Carl M. Felker, of Roseburg, argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief was Paul E. Geddes, of Roseburg.

Before BRAND, Chief Justice, and ROSSMAN, LUSK, LATOURETTE and WARNER, Justices.

AFFIRMED.

LATOURETTE, J.

This is a suit for specific performance of a contract for the sale of land brought by the assignees of the vendees against the vendors. The trial court decreed specific performance and the vendors appeal.

Following is a copy of the contract:

"THIS AGREEMENT, Made and entered into this 19th day of March, 1945, by and between S.W. Van Voorst and Emma Van Voorst, husband and wife, Parties of the First Part, and Frank...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases