BAILEY v. SCHRAMM

No. 31565.

38 Wn.2d 719 (1951)

231 P.2d 333

HENRY J. BAILEY, Respondent, v. HARRY SCHRAMM, Appellant.

The Supreme Court of Washington, Department Two.

May 19, 1951.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Louis J. Muscek and Marshall D. Adams, for appellant.

James P. Healy and Fred C. Dorsey, for respondent.

Emory, Howe, Davis & Riese, amici curiae.


GRADY, J.

The controversy before the court arose out of the will and in the matter of the estate of Katie Bailey. The will was admitted to probate, and Marie Schramm, a daughter of decedent, was appointed executrix. Upon her death, Harry Schramm, her surviving husband, was appointed administrator de bonis non with the will annexed of the estate.

At the time of the death of decedent, there existed three savings accounts in the joint names of Katie Bailey...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases