1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 102 F.Supp.
  5. 102 F.Supp. 649 (1951)
 

MIDWEST FUR PRODUCERS ASS'N v. MUTATION MINK B. ASS'N

Civ. No. 3752.

102 F.Supp. 649 (1951)

MIDWEST FUR PRODUCERS ASS'N et al. v. MUTATION MINK BREEDERS ASS'N.

United States District Court D. Minnesota, Fourth Division.

December 28, 1951.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

A. Lyman Beardsley and Morley, Cant, Taylor, Haverstock & Beardsley, Minneapolis, Minn. (Gerrit P. Groen and Wilkinson, Huxley, Byron & Hume, Chicago, Ill., of counsel), for defendant in support of said motion.

Lee Loevinger, Minneapolis, Minn. (Larson, Loevinger, Lindquist & Freeman, Minneapolis, Minn., of counsel), for plaintiffs in opposition thereto.

NORDBYE, Chief Judge.

This action is based upon the theory that defendant is violating the antitrust laws and is claiming trade mark rights to which it is not entitled. Defendant is a Wisconsin corporation, and process herein was served upon it at its principal place of business in Wisconsin. Defendant now moves (1) to quash the service of process upon the ground that this Court cannot exercise extra-territorial jurisdiction, and (2) to dismiss the action upon the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases