1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 98 F.Supp.
  5. 98 F.Supp. 650 (1951)
 

AUTOMATIC DIALING CORP. v. MARITIME QUALITY HARDWARE CO.

No. 736.

98 F.Supp. 650 (1951)

AUTOMATIC DIALING CORP. v. MARITIME QUALITY HARDWARE CO. et al.

United States District Court D. Maine, S. D.

July 2, 1951.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Sidney W. Wernick, Edward J. Berman, Portland, Me., for plaintiff.

George F. Peabody, Bangor, Me., for defendant Maritime Quality Hardware Co.

Edward G. Griffin, Agency Counsel, Boston, Mass., for defendant Reconstruction Finance Corp.

Edward Richards, Providence, R. I., and Leonard A. Pierce, and Edward W. Atwood, Portland, Me., for intervenor Sandsea, Inc., now Anchor Tool and Die Co.

CLIFFORD, District Judge.

This case arose as the result of the breakdown of a contract relationship, originally between Automatic Dialing Corporation (Autodial), a Deleware Corporation, and Maritime Quality Hardware Company, Inc., (Maritime) a Maine Corporation, concerning the manufacture of twelve pilot, or production, units of a device known as the teledial.

The case came to this Court on Autodial's complaint that Maritime had broken the contract. Autodial...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases