1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Or.
  4. 191 Or.
  5. 191 Or. 522 (1951)
 

CLARK v. FAZIO ET AL.

191 Or. 522 (1951)

230 P.2d 553

CLARK v. FAZIO ET AL.

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Affirmed April 25, 1951.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Carl D. Etling, of Portland, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs was Harry H. Daniel, of Portland.

E.K. Oppenheimer and Wayne A. Williamson argued the cause for respondents. On the brief were Wilbur, Beckett, Oppenheimer, Mautz & Souther, and Wayne A. Williamson, all of Portland.

Before BRAND, Chief Justice, and HAY, ROSSMAN, WARNER and TOOZE, Justices.

AFFIRMED.

TOOZE, J.

This is an action by Joseph E. Clark, as plaintiff, against Tony Fazio, Antonio Fazio, and Andrew Fazio, individually and as copartners, doing business as the Columbia Gardening Company, and Leo Louis Savio, as defendants, to recover damages for personal injuries sustained as the result of the alleged negligent operation of a motor truck. There was a verdict and judgment for plaintiff in the sum of $15,000. On defendants'

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases