ESTATE OF CHAPMAN


258 Wis. 442 (1951)

ESTATE OF CHAPMAN: STITES and others, Appellants, vs. CHAPMAN and others, Respondents.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

February 6, 1951.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellants there were briefs by Peterson & Kittelsen of Monroe, and oral argument by Marshall L. Peterson.

For the respondents there was a brief by Ervin W. Johnson of Darlington, and Gilbert Barnard of Elkhorn, for Ruth Chapman, Carol Jean Rudd, and Jeraldine Ruth Gordee, and by John J. Boyle of Darlington, guardian ad litem for Betty Lou Chapman, and oral orgument by Mr. Johnson and Mr. Barnard.


GEHL, J.

It is not claimed by appellants that William Steffen is not qualified to act. It is their claim that, in the absence of any showing that the bank is not qualified to act, its nomination by the testator compels its appointment as successor trustee.

When the bank renounced its right to serve as trustee it left the estate in the same position as if no one had been nominated in the will. 21 Am. Jur., Executors and Administrators, p. 430, sec. 99. It took...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases