SCHALL v. SCHALL


259 Wis. 412 (1951)

SCHALL, Appellant, vs. SCHALL, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

October 9, 1951.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there was a brief by Rogers & Vance, attorneys, and Wright Hallfrisch of counsel, all of Fort Atkinson, and oral argument by Mr. Hallfrisch. (The attorneys on this appeal did not represent the plaintiff in the divorce action proper.)

For the respondent there was a brief by Mistele & Smith of Jefferson, and oral argument by Lynn H. Smith.


FRITZ, C. J.

After the hearing pursuant to Elsie Schall's application on November 21, 1950, why the judgment entered May 31, 1949, should not be reopened and alimony for the wife determined, Judge DARLING stated:

"While the record in this case `speaks for itself,' it seems advisable, to me, to set forth briefly the history of this action before addressing the issues now presented to the court for determination. With...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases