1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 101 F.Supp.
  5. 101 F.Supp. 566 (1951)
 

MIKKELSEN v. THE GRANVILLE

No. 19231.

101 F.Supp. 566 (1951)

MIKKELSEN v. THE GRANVILLE et al.

United States District Court E. D. New York.

June 28, 1951.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Haight, Deming, Gardner, Poor & Havens, New York City, proctors for claimant-appellant, Skibs A/S Sommerstad; Walter A. Darby, Jr., New York City, advocate.

Purdy, Lamb & Catoggio, New York City, proctors for Sigurd Golten Mach. Corp., respondent - impleaded - appellee; Vincent A. Catoggio, New York City, advocate.

ABRUZZO, District Judge.

Sigurd Golten Machine Corporation (referred to herein as the employer) filed exceptions and exceptive allegations to a petition of an impleader filed by the claimant, S.S. Granville, impleading it as a party-respondent, and now moves to dismiss the amended libel and the petition of impleader.

The libellant instituted this suit in admiralty against the S.S. Granville and Weeks Stevedoring Company, Inc., to recover damages for personal...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases