1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.
  4. 260 Wis.
  5. 260 Wis. 395 (1951)
 

STATE EX REL. BORNEMANN v. SCHULTZ

260 Wis. 395 (1951)

STATE EX REL. BORNEMANN, Appellant, vs. SCHULTZ, Civil Judge, Defendant: NICKEL, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

January 8, 1952.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Paul E. Bornemann of Milwaukee, appellant, in pro. per.

For the respondent there was a brief by Whyte, Hirschboeck & Minahan, attorneys, and Robert P. Harland and John G. Vergeront of counsel, all of Milwaukee, and oral argument by Mr. Vergeront.

CURRIE, J.

The relator Bornemann contends that he is entitled to the writ of prohibition prayed for by him on the ground that the civil court of Milwaukee county and the respondent SCHULTZ, as a judge of said court, are without jurisdiction to vacate or grant other relief with respect to the two judgments docketed against Nickel on May 18, 1950, and June 2, 1950, respectively, because more than one year had elapsed since the entering and docketing of both of said...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases