1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 154 Ohio
  5. 154 Ohio St. 500 (1951)
 

DAYTON v. MILLER

No. 32248.

154 Ohio St. 500 (1951)

CITY OF DAYTON, APPELLEE, v. MILLER, APPELLANT.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided January 31, 1951.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Herbert S. Beane, city attorney, Mr. Maurice A. Russell, city prosecutor, and Mr. Joseph P. Duffy, for appellee.

Mr. A. K. Meck, for appellant.

BY THE COURT.

Appellant stresses the claim that the assault and battery ordinance of the city of Dayton, under which he was prosecuted, is invalid for the reason that municipal corporations have authority, under Section 3, Article XVIII of the Constitution, to enact only "local police regulations," whereas the ordinance in question is not such a regulation but is a general police regulation prescribing punishment for a crime.

Municipal corporations of this...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases