1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Or.
  4. 191 Or.
  5. 191 Or. 454 (1951)
 

SCHWEIGER v. SOLBECK

191 Or. 454 (1951)

230 P.2d 195

SCHWEIGER ET UX. v. SOLBECK ET UX. HONIG ET UX. v. SOLBECK ET UX.

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Affirmed April 4, 1951.

Petition for rehearing denied April 25, 1951.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Wallace A. Johansen argued the cause for appellants. With him on the brief were McKeown & Newhouse, all of Coos Bay.

Wesley A. Franklin argued the cause for respondents. On the brief were Lord, Anderson & Franklin, of Portland.

Before BRAND, Chief Justice, and HAY, ROSSMAN, WARNER and TOOZE, Justices.

AFFIRMED.

HAY, J.

These are two separate actions based upon the same facts. The plaintiffs in each case owned real property fronting on Ten Mile Lake, in Coos County. The properties are adjacent. They measure 50 feet on the side fronting the lake and approximately 380 feet in depth. Upon each property, prior to the event hereinafter mentioned, there stood a furnished cabin. Beginning about 100 yards from the back line of the property,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases