1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.
  4. 260 Wis.
  5. 260 Wis. 378 (1951)
 

ESTATE OF TULLOCH

260 Wis. 378 (1951)

ESTATE OF TULLOCH: WEBB, Claimant, Appellant, vs. LATIMER, Administrator, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

January 8, 1952.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there were briefs by Hale, Skemp, Nietsch, Hanson & Schnurrer of La Crosse, and oral argument by Thomas H. Skemp.

For the respondent there was a brief by Martin Gulbrandsen of Viroqua, and Donovan, Gleiss, Goodman, Breitenfield & Gleiss of Sparta, and oral argument by William M. Gleiss.

BROWN, J.

The court admitted almost all the testimony which Webb offered regardless of its being hearsay or otherwise incompetent and even with this testimony it seems quite clear that Tulloch never made any express agreement to compensate Webb in consideration of services to be rendered. From 1925 to 1938 Webb was brought up and lived in Tulloch's family and from 1933 to 1938 his wife lived there also. There is no suggestion that Tulloch ever charged them for their...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases