1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 63 S.E.2d
  5. 63 S.E.2d 565 (1951)
 

PERKINS v. LANGDON

No. 737.

63 S.E.2d 565 (1951)

233 N.C. 240

PERKINS et al. v. LANGDON.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

February 28, 1951.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert H. Dye, Fayetteville, and Cooper, Sanders & Holt, Burlington, for defendant-appellant.

Brooks, McLendon, Brim & Holderness, Greensboro, and James R. Nance, Fayetteville, for plaintiffs-appellees.

JOHNSON, Justice.

The pertinent allegations of the plaintiffs' complaint are succinctly summarized by Denny, J., in stating the facts in connection with the opinion in the decision on the former appeal. 231 N.C. 386, 57 S.E.2d 407. There, it appears that the plaintiffs originally set up and declared upon a parol contract by the terms of which they alleged the defendant agreed to lease to them two...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases