1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Okla.
  4. 205 Okla.
  5. 205 Okla. 397 (1951)
 

FOSTER v. ROSE

No. 33958.

205 Okla. 397 (1951)

238 P.2d 332

FOSTER v. ROSE et al.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

December 4, 1951.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ted Foster, pro se, and Roger L. Stephens, Oklahoma City, for plaintiff in error.

Harry W. Priest, R.A. Belisle, and Eugene P. Ledbetter, Oklahoma City, for defendant in error Ben N. Hatcher.

Russell Morgan, Oklahoma City, for defendants in error Harry Rose and Rollie D. Rose.

HALLEY, V.C.J.

Ted Foster, executor of the estate of Cleveland L. Rose, deceased, as plaintiff, alleged in his petition that Harry Rose, Rollie D. Rose, and Ben N. Hatcher had concealed, embezzled, smuggled, conveyed, or disposed of certain money which belonged to Cleveland L. Rose in his lifetime, and sought to recover under the provisions of sec. 292, 58 O.S. 1941, providing for the recovery by decedent's legal representative of double the value of money or other...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases