CHAMBERLIN v. CLARK BROS.

No. 11895.

96 F.Supp. 498 (1951)

CHAMBERLIN v. CLARK BROS. et al.

United States District Court S. D. California, Central Division.

March 30, 1951.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Albert J. Fihe, Burbank, Cal., for plaintiff.

Elwood S. Kendrick, Los Angeles, Cal., for defendants.


YANKWICH, District Judge.

The above-entitled cause, heretofore tried, argued and submitted, is hereby decided as follows:

Upon the grounds set forth in the Comment to follow, judgment will be for the defendants that the plaintiff take nothing by the Third Amended Complaint. No attorney's fees are allowed, each side to pay its own costs.

Findings and judgment to be prepared by counsel for defendants.

Comment

The action is for infringement...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases