PTAK v. GENERAL ELECTRIC CO.


16 N.J. Super. 573 (1951)

85 A.2d 214

MARGARET PTAK, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, v. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided December 11, 1951.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Verling C. Enteman argued the cause for the appellant (Messrs. McCarter, English & Studer, attorneys).

Mr. William Rossmoore argued the cause for the respondent (Mr. Morton Stavis, attorney).

Before Judges JACOBS, EASTWOOD and BIGELOW.


The opinion of the court was delivered by JACOBS, S.J.A.D.

The Workmen's Compensation Division dismissed the petitioner's claim at the close of her case; this was reversed by the County Court and the cause remanded for further proceedings in the division; appeal to this court was taken pursuant to leave granted under Rule 4:2-2(b).

The testimony on petitioner's behalf is fully set forth in the County Court's opinion reported in Ptak v. General...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases