PLUMMER v. KINGSLEY


190 Or. 378 (1951)

226 P.2d 297

PLUMMER v. KINGSLEY

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Reversed January 4, 1951.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John F. Kilkenny, of Pendleton, argued the cause for appellant. On the brief were Raley, Kilkenny & Raley, of Pendleton.

W.E. Hanzen, of Pendleton, argued the cause and filed a brief for respondent.

Before LUSK, Chief Justice, and BRAND, ROSSMAN, HAY and WARNER, Justices.


REVERSED.

BRAND, J.

The plaintiff Plummer brings this action in replevin against the defendant Kingsley for the recovery of a certain automobile or its value. The answer asserts title in defendant based on estoppel. After issue joined, the case was tried by the court without a jury. The court made findings of fact and conclusions of law and entered judgment that the plaintiff recover possession of the automobile, or...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases