1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Or.
  4. 193 Or.
  5. 193 Or. 364 (1951)
 

INVESTM'T SERVICE CO. v. BRONKEY ET UX.

193 Or. 364 (1951)

238 P.2d 245

INVESTMENT SERVICE CO. v. BRONKEY ET UX.

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Affirmed December 5, 1951.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

S.G. Heflin, of Portland, argued the cause for appellants. With him on the brief was Larry Landgraver, of Portland.

Wilber Henderson argued the cause for respondent. On the brief were Platt, Henderson, Cram & Dickinson, and John E. Huisman, all of Portland.

Before BRAND, Chief Justice, and HAY, LUSK, LATOURETTE and TOOZE, Justices.

AFFIRMED.

TOOZE, J.

This is an action brought by Investment Service Co., an Oregon corporation, as plaintiff, against Ivan J. Bronkey and Wilma L. Bronkey, as defendants, to recover the balance due on two promissory notes executed and delivered by defendants to the United States National Bank of Portland (Oregon), and which notes were duly assigned to plaintiff prior to the commencement of this proceeding. The case was tried to a jury. Upon motion of plaintiff...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases