HARRIS v. HARRIS


192 Or. 361 (1951)

232 P.2d 818

HARRIS v. HARRIS

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Reversed with directions June 13, 1951.

Petition for rehearing denied September 5, 1951.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John F. Kilkenny, of Pendleton, argued the cause for appellant. On the brief were W.E. Hanzen and Raley, Kilkenny & Raley, all of Pendleton.

Charles F. Luce, of Walla Walla, Washington, and Charles R. Cater, of La Grande, argued the cause and filed a brief for respondents.

Before BRAND, Chief Justice, and ROSSMAN, LATOURETTE, WARNER and TOOZE, Justices.


REVERSED WITH DIRECTIONS.

TOOZE, J.

On July 7, 1949, the circuit court for Umatilla county made and entered of record its final decree in a partition suit, in which suit appellant Claude Harris is plaintiff, and respondents Mable Harris, Martha Harris Pfieffer, and John Pfieffer, her husband, are defendants.

By the decree, certain described parcels of land were set off and awarded to plaintiff and other parcels to defendants. The decree also provided...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases