ERBELDING v. NOLAND CO. INC.

33313.

83 Ga. App. 464 (1951)

64 S.E.2d 218

ERBELDING v. NOLAND COMPANY INC.

Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Decided March 13, 1951.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Henry J. Heffernan, for plaintiff in error.

Fulcher & Fulcher, contra.


MacINTYRE, P. J.

1. Code § 103-101 provides: "The contract of suretyship is one whereby a person obligates himself to pay the debt of another in consideration of credit or indulgence, or other benefit given to his principal, the principal remaining bound therefor. It differs from a guaranty in this, that the consideration of the latter is a benefit flowing to the guarantor." This is but one of the distinctions between suretyship and

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases