PER CURIAM.
The appellant contends that as a matter of law the jury could not find that the appellee was diligent and timely in the conduct of the resale of the lumber and that there was no evidence that appellee's alleged resales were timely or were made in good faith, by way of reducing the appellant's damages for breach of contract. The line between questions of fact and of law is frequently narrow but in the instant case the acts done by the appellee to reduce...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
