MATTER OF FINKLE v. CUSHING STONE CO.


278 A.D. 250 (1951)

In the Matter of the Claim of Ivan Finkle, Respondent, v. Cushing Stone Company, Inc., et al., Appellants, and The Special Funds Conservation Committee, Respondent. Workmen's Compensation Board, Respondent

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Third Department.

May 9, 1951.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bernard Katzen, General Attorney of The State Insurance Fund (Victor Fiddler and George J. Hayes of counsel), for appellants.

Ivan Finkle, claimant-respondent in person.

Nathaniel L. Goldstein, Attorney-General (Roy Wiedersum and Gilbert M. Landy of counsel), for the Workmen's Compensation Board, respondent.

John M. Cullen for Special Funds Conservation Committee, respondent.

HEFFERNAN, DEYO, BERGAN and COON, JJ., concur.


FOSTER, P. J.

Appeal by employer and The State Insurance Fund, its carrier, from an award made by the Workmen's Compensation Board to an injured workman.

Claimant's right to an award is not questioned. The sole issue is whether appellants or the Special Fund for Reopened Cases should pay the award.

The following dates are pertinent. Claimant suffered an industrial accident on August 28, 1939. The...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases