COX v. COX


259 Wis. 259 (1951)

COX, Respondent, v. COX, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

June 15, 1951.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there was a brief by William A. Cameron and Howard W. Cameron, both of Rice Lake, and oral argument by Howard W. Cameron.

Darrell O. Hibbard and Frank E. Betz, both of Eau Claire, for the respondent.


HUGHES, J.

Counsel for appellant concedes that the application to open the divorce judgment and allow her additional property is addressed to the discretion of the trial court. She contends however that denial of her application amounted to an abuse of discretion and should be reversed.

The trial court found that there is a "total failure of proof of any mistake inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect on the part of the defendant." This finding is completely...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases