1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Conn.
  4. 137 Conn.
  5. 137 Conn. 380 (1951)
 

ALMADA v. ADMINISTRATOR

137 Conn. 380 (1951)

MANUEL P. ALMADA ET AL. v. THE ADMINISTRATOR, UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION ACT, ET AL.

Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Decided January 2, 1951.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert Ewing, for the appellant (defendant General Ice Cream Corporation).

William S. Gordon, Jr., with whom was Stephen M. Riley, for the appellees (plaintiffs).

BROWN, C. J., JENNINGS, BALDWIN, INGLIS and O'SULLIVAN, JS.

INGLIS, J.

The question involved in this case is whether the plaintiffs, whose unemployment resulted from a labor dispute in which they were participants, come within the provision in our Unemployment Compensation Act which allows benefits if the unemployment is caused by a lockout.

The finding of the unemployment commissioners, which was added to by the Superior Court and in which no further corrections may be made...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases