STATE v. YUDICK

No. 32354.

98 N.E.2d 415 (1951)

155 Ohio St. 269

STATE v. YUDICK.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided April 18, 1951.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Alva J. Russell, Pros. Atty. and Robert Azar, Akron, for appellant.

Hertz, Kates & Walzer, Cleveland, for appellee.


MATTHIAS, Judge.

The single question considered and decided by the Court of Appeals was the sufficiency or insufficiency in law of the indictment returned by the grand jury.

Section 13437-4, General Code, provides as follows: "In charging an offense, each count shall contain, and shall be sufficient if it contains in substance, a statement that the accused has committed some public offense therein specified. Such statements may be made in ordinary and concise...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases