1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 80 A.2d
  5. 80 A.2d 429 (1951)
 

IN RE MORFORD

80 A.2d 429 (1951)

In re MORFORD et al.

Supreme Court of Delaware.

April 18, 1951.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Clarence A. Southerland and Alexander L. Nichols, of Wilmington, petitioners by appointment of the Court.

Daniel J. Layton, of Georgetown, for respondent James R. Morford.

Arthur G. Connolly, of Wilmington, for respondent Morton E. Evans.

WOLCOTT, Chancellor, RICHARDS, C. J., TERRY, CAREY, JJ., SEITZ, V. Chancellor, and HERRMANN, J., sitting.

PER CURIAM.

The petition prays that the respondents be required to show cause why disciplinary measures should not be directed against them. The respondents waived the issuance of a rule and filed their answers to the petition praying that it be dismissed. By stipulation of the parties, the case is to be determined upon the petition, answers and transcript of the testimony taken before the Censor Committee, excluding therefrom the testimony of certain witnesses deemed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases