IN RE APPLICATION OF BOROUGH OF PEAPACK-GLADSTONE


11 N.J. Super. 498 (1951)

78 A.2d 600

IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF THE BOROUGH OF PEAPACK-GLADSTONE FOR EMERGENCY DIVERSION FROM TIGER BROOK, EXTENSION IN TIME (W.S. APPLICATION NO. 572).

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided February 1, 1951.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Ronald A. Gulick, attorney for and of counsel with appellants, Harrison P. Lindabury, Sara E. Lindabury, Elizabeth Cutting Booker, Neville J. Booker and Samuel MacGregor, argued the cause.

Mr. Robert Peacock argued the cause for the defendant-respondent, Division of Water Policy and Supply of the Department of Conservation and Economic Development (Mr. Theodore D. Parsons, Attorney General of New Jersey).

Mr. Bradford C. Seaman, attorney for and of counsel with defendant-respondent, Borough of Peapack-Gladstone, argued the cause.

Before Judges FREUND, PROCTOR and ROGERS.


The opinion of the court was delivered by PROCTOR, J.A.D.

Appellants, property owners having riparian rights affected by the diversion of water from Tiger Brook in Morris County, challenge the validity of a resolution adopted on June 19, 1950, by the Water Policy and Supply Council, in the State Department of Conservation and Economic Development. The respondents are the Council and the Borough of Peapack-Gladstone...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases