The sole question on this appeal is whether the contract in suit is void and unenforcible under the Statute of Frauds (Personal Property Law, § 31, subd. 1).
On July 21, 1938, it is claimed that the parties entered into an oral agreement wherein and whereby the defendants promised and agreed that so long as the plaintiff purchased its requirements for gasoline through the defendants, and the defendants accepted such orders, the...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
