IN RE TWENTY-ONE SLOT MACHINES, ETC.

No. 5314.

72 Ariz. 408 (1951)

236 P.2d 733

In re TWENTY-ONE SLOT MACHINES, etc. TUCSON PRESS CLUB et al. v. EYMAN.

Supreme Court of Arizona.

October 15, 1951.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

E.T. Cusick and Richard H. Chambers, Tucson, for appellants.

Fred O. Wilson, Atty. Gen., Maurice Barth, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Robert Morrison, County Atty. of Pima County, Tucson, for appellee.

David H. Palmer, Jr., County Atty. of Yavapai County, Prescott, amicus curiae.


GIBBONS, Superior Court Judge.

This is an appeal from judgments and orders of the superior court of Pima County decreeing certain slot machines property illegal per se, directing the destruction thereof, and denying owners' motion to return money contained therein at the time of seizure.

Since the docketing of this appeal, by stipulation of counsel there has been an order substituting (a) Frank A. Eyman, present sheriff of Pima County, Arizona, as appellee...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases