CHIRELSTEIN v. CHIRELSTEIN


12 N.J. Super. 468 (1951)

79 A.2d 884

CECILE CHIRELSTEIN, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. NATHAN CHIRELSTEIN, AND OTHERS, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided March 20, 1951.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Benjamin M. Ratner argued the cause for the appellant.

Mr. Edward J. Gilhooly argued the cause for the respondent Nathan Chirelstein (Messrs. Gilhooly & Yauch, attorneys).

Mr. Aaron Lasser argued the cause for the respondent-intervenors, Helen Chirelstein, et al. (Messrs. Hannoch & Lasser, attorneys, and Mr. Irving Lloyd Gang, on the brief).

Before Judges JACOBS, EASTWOOD, and BIGELOW.


The opinion of the court was delivered by BIGELOW, J.A.D.

This is a matrimonial cause with some unusual complications in the law, but with little dispute over the material facts. The complaint contains three causes of action, of which the last two were added by amendment three months after the original complaint was filed, embodying only the first claim. The first count or claim alleges: The parties were married in...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases