BLAKE v. CITY OF CONCORD

No. 384.

64 S.E.2d 408 (1951)

233 N.C. 480

BLAKE v. CITY OF CONCORD et al.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 18, 1951.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

E. T. Bost, Jr., and W. Preston White, Jr., Concord, for plaintiff, appellant.

Hartsell & Hartsell and C. S. Morgan, Jr., all of Concord, for defendant, City of Concord, appellee.

Jones & Small, Charlotte, and John Hugh Williams, Concord, J. Lawrence Jones, Charlotte, for defendant, Board of Light & Water Commissioners, appellee.


STACY, Chief Justice.

The following excerpt from the charge constitutes the only exception brought forward and discussed in plaintiff's brief: "Our court has held in Groome v. [City of] Statesville, 207 N.C. 538 [177 S.E. 638], that if there are two ways open to a person to use—one safe and the other dangerous— the choice of the dangerous way with knowledge of the danger constitutes contributory negligence, and where a person sui juris, that is...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases