1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.
  4. 259 Wis.
  5. 259 Wis. 197 (1951)
 

TORPHY v. CONTINENTAL CASUALTY CO.

259 Wis. 197 (1951)

TORPHY, Respondent, vs. CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

May 8, 1951.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there was a brief by Beyer & Sonnenberg, Ernst A. Beyer, Herbert F. Sonnenberg, and Gregory P. Thibodeau, all of Milwaukee, and oral argument by Mr. Thibodeau.

For the respondent there was a brief by Karon & Weinberg of Milwaukee, and oral argument by Morris Karon.

BROADFOOT, J.

The parties agree that if there is ambiguity in the provisions of an insurance contract it is to be construed against the company and in favor of the insured. The plaintiff contends that the provisions of the policy providing for indemnity for loss of time from disability are ambiguous and that he is entitled to indemnity for that portion of his disability beyond the first three months thereof. Defendant contends that the provisions of the policy in...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases