1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 85 A.2d
  5. 85 A.2d 361 (1951)
 

IN RE GOLDSTEIN

85 A.2d 361 (1951)

In re GOLDSTEIN.

Supreme Court of Delaware.

December 20, 1951.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Henry M. Canby and James L. Latchum, Wilmington, petitioners, constituting a committee of the bar appointed by the Court.

Daniel O. Hastings, Wilmington, for respondent Louis Goldstein.

SOUTHERLAND, C. J., and WOLCOTT and TUNNELL, JJ., sitting.

SOUTHERLAND, Chief Justice.

Pursuant to charges of unprofessional conduct against Louis Goldstein, Esquire, a member of the bar, the Censor Committee of this Court held hearings upon the matter and filed its report with the Court. The report finds that certain of the canons of professional ethics have been violated by the respondent, viz., canon 6, relating to an attorney's representation of an interest adverse to that of his client; canon 9, relating to direct communications...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases