HOWSON v. MARLENE BLOUSE CORP.


200 Misc. 242 (1951)

Eliza Howson, Appellant, v. Marlene Blouse Corp., Respondent, et al., Defendants.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department.

June 21, 1951.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Harold Weiss and Leo Moskowitz for appellant.

William L. Shumate for respondent.

HOFSTADTER, EDER and SCHREIBER, JJ., concur.


Per Curiam.

A witness who is present in or just outside the courtroom may be required to testify notwithstanding the fact that he was not served with a subpœna.

The judgment should be reversed and a new trial ordered, with $30 costs to appellant to abide the event.

Judgment...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases