ACKER v. SKROTSKY


17 N.J. Super. 27 (1951)

85 A.2d 277

DOROTHY J. ACKER, ADMINISTRATRIX, ETC., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. JOSEPH SKROTSKY, ETC., DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided December 26, 1951.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Henry F. Schenk argued the cause for the appellant.

Mr. Charles W. Kappes, Jr., argued the cause for the respondent (Messrs. Riker, Emery & Danzig, attorneys).

Before Judges JACOBS, EASTWOOD and BIGELOW.


PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff appeals from two orders of the Chancery Division.

The plaintiff is administrator of assets within the State of New Jersey, late of Robert E. Acker, deceased. Her intestate and the defendant were partners in an enterprise known as Metro Printing Service. The partnership was dissolved by Acker's death four years ago, and it thereupon became Skrotsky's duty to wind up the business and account...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases