1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 98 F.Supp.
  5. 98 F.Supp. 340 (1951)
 

WARFEL v. UNITED STATES

No. 49160.

98 F.Supp. 340 (1951)

WARFEL v. UNITED STATES.

United States Court of Claims.

Decided July 9, 1951.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bernard Shapiro, Los Angeles, Cal., Gendel & Raskoff, Los Angeles, Cal., on the briefs, for plaintiff.

Abner H. Ferguson, Washington, D. C., Watters, Cowen & Baldridge, Washington, D. C., on the briefs, for Third Party Defendant (Bank of Hawaii).

Carl Eardley, Washington, D. C., Newell A. Clapp, Acting Asst. Atty. Gen., for defendant.

Before JONES, Chief Judge, and LITTLETON, WHITAKER, MADDEN and HOWELL, Judges.

HOWELL, Judge.

MacNeel Pierce and Nathan O. Hulsey, residents of California, formed a partnership known as The Haneel Company. Among other ventures, the partnership undertook the manufacture and sale of certain cameras, commencing production of this item sometime in 1945. Edward A. Bischoff, by arrangement with the partnership, invested $4,000 in The Haneel Company and undertook to sell and distribute the cameras and related items. Originally, Bischoff operated from...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases