1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 98 F.Supp.
  5. 98 F.Supp. 334 (1951)
 

REMINGTON RAND, INC. v. UNITED STATES

98 F.Supp. 334 (1951)

REMINGTON RAND, Inc. v. UNITED STATES et al. (JOHN T. CLARK & SON et al., Impleaded). The SAMIDA.

United States District Court S. D. New York.

June 5, 1951.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bailey & Muller, New York City (Robert F. Doran, New York City, of counsel), for libelant.

Irving H. Saypol, U.S. Atty., New York City (William H. Postner, New York City, of counsel), for respondents.

Atkins & Weymar, New York City (William Weymar, Jr., New York City, of counsel), for impleaded respondent John T. Clark & Son.

Dow & Symmers, New York City (Edwin K. Reid, New York City, of counsel), for impleaded respondent McRoberts Protective Agency, Inc.

S. H. KAUFMAN, District Judge.

This libel was filed by the assignee of a bill of lading to recover the value of goods which the carrier failed to deliver at the port of destination. By agreement of the parties, the libel has been deemed discontinued as against a number of the original parties, and the respondents in this case now are: The United States of America, which holds the legal title to the S.S. Samida and which has agreed to pay any final decree against Ellerman...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases