1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ga.
  4. 208 Ga.
  5. 208 Ga. 222 (1951)
 

MORRIS & ECKELS CO. v. FULTON NATL. BANK

17516.

208 Ga. 222 (1951)

65 S.E.2d 815

MORRIS & ECKELS CO. v. FULTON NATIONAL BANK et al.

Supreme Court of Georgia.

Decided July 9, 1951.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

I. A. Blanch, for plaintiff.

Smith, Kilpatrick, Cody, Rogers & McClatchey, Powell, Goldstein, Frazer & Murphy, J. Winston Huff, and Elliott Goldstein, for defendants.

DUCKWORTH, Chief Justice.

A mortgage must specify the property upon which it is to take effect. Code, § 67-102. And the words "to specify" have been described in Stewart v. Jaques, 77 Ga. 365 (3 S. E. 283) as meaning "to point out, to particularize, to designate by words one thing from another." While the law does not require such a description as will identify the property without the aid of parol evidence, yet the words of such description —...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases