1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.
  4. 260 Wis.
  5. 260 Wis. 169 (1951)
 

BASCHE v. VANDEN HEUVEL

260 Wis. 169 (1951)

BASCHE, Respondent, vs. VANDEN HEUVEL and another, Appellants.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

December 4, 1951.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellants there were briefs by Kaftan, Kaftan & Kaftan of Green Bay, and oral argument by Fred F. Kaftan.

For the respondent there was a brief by Chadek, Cornelisen, Denissen & Farrell, and oral argument by Frank P. Cornelisen and E. D. Kranzush, all of Green Bay.

GEHL, J.

This was an unmarked crosswalk. No complaint is made of the court's instruction defining a crosswalk as follows:

"A crosswalk is defined by statute as that portion of the highway ordinarily included within the prolongation of the curb and property lines at intersections or any other portion of the highway clearly indicated for pedestrian crossing by lines or other markers on the surface. . . . The crosswalk referred to in the statute, . . . is the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases