LAW v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD

No. 4224.

192 F.2d 236 (1951)

LAW et al. v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD.

United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit.

October 25, 1951.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

R. C. Garland, Las Cruces, N. M. (Garland & Sanders, Las Cruces, N. M., on the brief), for petitioners.

Arnold Ordman, Atty., NLRB, Washington, D. C. (George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, NLRB, David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, NLRB, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, NLRB, Arnold Ordman, Atty., NLRB, all of Washington, D. C., and Rosanna A. Blake, Atty., NLRB, Takoma Park, Md., on the brief), for respondent.

Before PHILLIPS, Chief Judge, and BRATTON and HUXMAN, Circuit Judges.


PHILLIPS, Chief Judge.

This is a petition to review and set aside an order of the National Labor Relations Board.1 In its answer to the petition the Board prayed that its order be enforced.

The Board found that petitioners by interrogation, threats and surveillance interfered with, restrained and coerced their employees in violation of § 8(a) (1) of the National Labor Relations Act, as amended,2

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases