OGINO v. BLACK


278 A.D. 146 (1951)

Yoshi Ogino, Respondent, v. Bernard C. Black, Appellant, et al., Defendants

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

April 24, 1951.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John F. X. Finn of counsel (Norman C. Mendes with him on the brief; Rudser & Mulligan, attorneys), for appellant.

Robert Aronstein of counsel (William B. Aronstein with him on the brief; Robert Aronstein, attorney), for respondent.

DORE, CALLAHAN and SHIENTAG, JJ., concur in Per Curiam opinion; VAN VOORHIS, J., dissents in part in opinion in which PECK, P. J., concurs.


Per Curiam.

This appeal is from two orders which struck out separate defenses in the amended answer.

The complaint alleges that plaintiff, an employee of defendant, was injured while a passenger in an automobile owned and controlled by defendant and being driven in North Carolina at defendant's request. Plaintiff alleges negligent operation of the automobile by another...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases