ARENSTEIN v. MOGULL'S FILM & CAMERA EXCH.


278 A.D. 139 (1951)

Murray Arenstein, Appellant-Respondent, v. Mogull's Film & Camera Exchange, Inc., Respondent-Appellant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

April 24, 1951.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Sidney C. Norris for appellant-respondent.

Maurice Kozinn for respondent-appellant.

DORE, J. P., COHN, CALLAHAN, VAN VOORHIS and SHIENTAG, JJ., concur.


Per Curiam.

The defendant moved, under the authority of Dorros, Inc., v. Dorros Bros. (274 App. Div. 11) to examine the plaintiff in an action brought by the plaintiff, a real estate broker, to recover compensation under an oral contract of employment for services rendered by him to the defendant and for which the defendant promised and agreed to pay. The court at Special Term disallowed items 1 and 2 of the proposed examination reading as follows:<...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases