VASSALO v. STAKSER


199 Misc. 216 (1951)

Charles Vassalo, Respondent, v. Dora Stakser, Appellant.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department.

January 18, 1951.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Elihu A. Novick for appellant.

James A. Murphy and Samuel Levy for respondent.

HAMMER, EDER and HECHT, JJ., concur.


Per Curiam.

Upon the facts presented the plaintiff has no maintainable cause of action against the defendant for the removal of the antenna.

The judgment should be reversed, with $10 costs, and complaint dismissed upon the merits, with costs.

Judgment...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases