AKAMINE v. MURPHY

Docket No. 15212.

108 Cal.App.2d 294 (1951)

238 P.2d 606

RICHARD AKAMINE, Petitioner, v. DANIEL C. MURPHY, as Sheriff, etc., Respondent

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division One.

December 20, 1951.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Arthur D. Klang for Petitioner.

Raymond D. Williamson for Respondent.


BRAY, J.

This petition for a writ of mandate raises the question: Is the rule of the San Francisco county jail to the effect that any person who has been released from the county jail may not visit an inmate within 30 days of such release, reasonable as applied to husband and wife under the circumstances of this case?

FACTS

Petitioner and Shirley Akamine are alleged to be husband and wife. They, together with others, were indicted on charges of violating...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases