ANTHONY GRIGNANO CO. v. GOOCH


259 Wis. 138 (1951)

ANTHONY GRIGNANO COMPANY, Plaintiff, vs. GOOCH and others, Defendants and Appellants: BANK OF MADISON, Defendant and Respondent.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

May 8, 1951.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellants there was a brief by Conway & Conway of Baraboo, attorneys, and Walter D. Corrigan, Sr., and Thomas M. Corrigan, both of Milwaukee, of counsel, and oral argument by Walter D. Corrigan, Sr., and Vaughn S. Conway.

For the respondent there was a brief by Aberg, Bell, Blake & Conrad, and oral argument by W. J. P. Aberg and Floyd Springer, Jr., all of Madison.


GEHL, J.

Foreclosure sale was had. The owners complain that the judgment failed to direct "that the interest of the owners in the premises at the commencement of the work," etc., be sold as required by sec. 289.12, Stats.; also that the notice of sale omitted to indicate that such "interest" would be sold. We consider that there is no merit in this contention. The court was without power to order, and the sheriff was equally without power to sell, anything except...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases