PEPE v. URBAN


11 N.J. Super. 385 (1951)

78 A.2d 406

CATHERINE PEPE AND ANOTHER, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. STEVE URBAN, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided January 16, 1951.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Harry Chashin argued the cause for the appellants (Messrs. Marcus & Levy and Hyman W. Rosenthal, attorneys).

Mr. Joseph J. DeLuccia argued the cause for the respondent (Mr. A. Leo Bohl, attorney).

Before Judges JACOBS, EASTWOOD and BIGELOW.


The opinion of the court was delivered by BIGELOW, J.A.D.

This appeal is unusual in that no consideration need be given to the facts that led to the litigation. The only matter for discussion is the court's handling of a situation arising at the trial from the failure of one of plaintiff's witnesses to appear.

The trial of the action, which was brought on account of personal injuries allegedly resulting from defendant's negligence, consumed a little more than...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases