1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 193 F.2d
  5. 193 F.2d 194 (1951)
 

MOORE v. PROCTER & GAMBLE CO.

Patent Appeal No. 5817.

193 F.2d 194 (1951)

MOORE v. PROCTER & GAMBLE CO.

United States Court of Customs and Patent Appeals.

December 18, 1951.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Parry, Miller & Peverill, Washington, D. C. (Edmund H. Parry, Jr., Washington, D. C., of counsel), for appellant.

Allen & Allen, Cincinnati, Ohio (Erastus S. Allen, Cincinnati, Ohio, of counsel), for appellee.

Before GARRETT, Chief Judge, and JACKSON, O'CONNELL, JOHNSON, and WORLEY, Judges.

O'CONNELL, Judge.

This is an appeal from the decision of the Assistant Commissioner of Patents, 85 U.S.P.Q. 176, acting for the commissioner in an opposition proceeding instituted by appellee, owner and prior user of the mark "Duz," together with the slogan "Does More," against the registration of appellant's mark "Duz Mor."

"Duz Mor" has been used since March of 1943 by appellant or its assignor in the sale in packages of louse powder for poultry, livestock...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases