1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ill.
  4. 344 Ill.
  5. 344 Ill. App. 40 (1951)
 

TINKOFF v. WHARTON

Gen. No. 45,183.

344 Ill. App. 40 (1951)

99 N.E.2d 915

Paysoff Tinkoff, Paysoff Tinkoff, Jr., and Ella H. Tinkoff, Trading as Paysoff Tinkoff and Son, Plaintiff-Appellants, v. Roy H. Wharton and The City National Bank and Trust Company of Chicago, Defendants-Appellees.

Appellate Court of Illinois.

Released for publication July 30, 1951.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

PAYSOFF TINKOFF, pro se, and A.M. HORWITZ, of Chicago, for appellants.

S.R. PETERSON of Chicago, for certain appellee; C.W. HORTSMAN, of Chicago, of counsel.

BELL, BOYD, MARSHALL & LLOYD, of Chicago, for certain other appellee; F. WILLIAM REEB, of Chicago, of counsel.

MR. PRESIDING JUSTICE BURKE delivered the opinion of the court.

On July 14, 1946, Paysoff Tinkoff, Paysoff Tinkoff, Jr., and Ella H. Tinkoff, doing business as Paysoff Tinkoff & Son, filed a statement of claim against Roy H. Wharton, alleging that at the request of the defendant they prepared certain income tax returns and estimated tax returns for him; that the reasonable value of their services was $537.50; and that defendant paid thereon $37.50, leaving a balance...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases