KING v. RUTLEDGE

17464.

208 Ga. 172 (1951)

65 S.E.2d 801

KING et al. v. RUTLEDGE et al.

Supreme Court of Georgia.

Decided June 11, 1951.

Rehearing Denied July 10, 1951.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Harbin M. King, for plaintiffs.

T. L. Shanahan, for defendants.


WYATT, Justice.

1. Without deciding whether or not the plaintiffs in the court below could amend their petition as is here attempted, we find that the petition does not set out a cause of action for any of the relief sought. Count one of the petition as amended seeks to recover a general judgment against all the defendants for the sum alleged to be due. The petition alleges that the defendant Joe Fossett, a contractor, was employed by the defendants Mr. and Mrs. Rutledge...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases